I am a Wikipedian in Residence which, unsurprisingly, I often have to explain to people what that actually means. Yet, the occupation is on the rise, and I wonder when the day will come when such an explanation is not necessary. I investigated the history of the number of people in this employ while musing at GLAM Camp London, and had this output.… Read the rest
Here’s how I structured the game, and how you could build from it.
- The game pieces consisted of 3 sizes of circles at 2.5cm 5cm and 8cm radii.
- I was experimenting with the right point attribution for each. As shown the point values are 1, 3, and 8 respectively.
- The maps were drawn by Anca Mosoiu of TechLiminal, and included the standard square, the African continent, and a silhouette of a meditating Buddha (pictured).
- Participants compete head-to-head,
- and are given 30-seconds,
- to lay down non-overlapping circles,
- within the drawn boundary.
Searching through my draft blogs I find that the earliest is un-annotated, but prophetic collection of quotes I compiled in 2011. They are from Walter Isaacson’s Steve Jobs biography, that too-strong dose of propaganda that turned me off of the mystique of supposedly messianic technology. (Perhaps I don’t give enough weight to the fact that it was the first and last book that I read entirely on a laptop). I admit I was – and still am – wooed by the allure of technolust, but at that moment, I stopped seeing computational progress as a deliverance and started seeing it blunt tool, often overdressed.… Read the rest
Axel Pettersson is a well-bearded Swede who feels equally at home at the stern of his clipper and editing Wikipedia from within the arctic circle. He’s also a blogger extraordinaire, having given interviews for Wikimedia with Nobel prize winners, at the Nobel prize ceremony.
Most recently he’s collected profiles of what I’d like to imagine as a sort of Wikimedia dream team. I’d like to thank him for including me in that cohort.
From the article:
… Read the rest
Som en del av det ansvarade dom för en intressant förkonferens om Wikipedia loves Libraries dagen innan Wikimania började.
Part of the responsible organization for an interesting pre-conference of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries days before Wikimania started.
Perusing the Jerusalem last night, unwittingly in my Wikipedia sweatshit, I was asked about my donation this year. On the tail of my positive response I richoceted the question. “Yes,” he responded “you had the picture of the cute girl [on the banner].”
Internal measurements of banner ad effectiveness are well examined in the Wikimedia foundation. If it’s found that pictures of attractive young female editors sell donations faster, should that be exploited. Or is sexism for a good cause, still sexism?… Read the rest
“No – your refrigerator is too low-fidelity to be counted as a phonograph: it cannot reproduce sounds at all.” (Hofstadter 406). This retort in Goedel Escher Bach from Achilles to the Tortoise represents the crux of the argument between Zen and the Pragmatist. While Achilles reacts sensibly to the inaudability of the cold plastic disk, isn’t the Tortoise in competition for Zen practitioner of the year?
In my most recent involvement with self-appointed subculture, the Zorba Festival, the nerve centre of all Negev Desert chill-outs, I lost a similar battle but wouldn’t know it until too late. The tent was in fact patchwork canvas over a geodesic dome, the time late, and the attendees personified bric-a-brac.… Read the rest
Should you take someone else’s advice to trust yourself?
Suppose yes. Then you should take someone’s advice to trust yourself. So you should trust yourself. But if you trusted yourself you wouldn’t take someone else’s advice. Contradiction.
Suppose no. Then you should not take someone’s advice to trust yourself. So you should not trust yourself. If should not trust yourself then you ought to take other people’s advice. Contradiction.
Since both yes and no to this question lead to contradiction then the question presents a paradox. Q.E.D.